Monday, 28 September 2009

Supermarkets' Bloody Vaccination Campaign

By Dr. Leonard Horowitz and Sherri Kane

Wondering why food stores and pharmacies have replaced doctors offices and clinics as vaccination stations? Ask Steve Burd, the wizard behind Obama's Health Care Reform plan.

Burd, the Chairman of Safeway Supermarkets (VONS, Pavilions, and more) is also the founder of the Coalition to Advance Healthcare Reform (CAHR) in the US., and Burd has his fingers in more pies than healthcare. His partners genocidal operations are evidenced in shocking documents delivered by these authors to the FBI last week proving Safeway's vaccinations and health care promotions are dangerously impure and unsafe.

Burd's ties to the worlds most powerful vaccine lobby and biotech trust, Partnership for New York City (PNYC), best explain why Safeway is heralding and administering shots, including the new H1N1 flu vaccines, like never before.

Safeway and Burd's conflicting interests are alarming. Partners in the PNYC includes Safeway owner Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR) that acquired the chain in 1986. Burd and Lloyd C. Blankfein of Goldman Sachs are the two highest paid CEOs in America, both are high profile corporate members of the most powerful Business Council in the world, and both maintain tight connections to the drug-ring implicated in creating and circulating the 2009 pandemic.

The directed America's transition out of the Great Depression advising Congress to advance the Security and Exchange Act, the Banking Act, and the Social Security Act of 1935.

Experts believe that foul play is obviously behind the current pandemic as evidenced by the virus's genetics. The feared flu is a laboratory-recombinant of swine from Mexico, avian (bird) from Asia, and a human corpse contaminated with flu genes from the 1918 Spanish pandemic unearthed despite protests from scientists worldwide. The official explanation alleges an impossible, natural mating of genes from some Asian chicken, Mexican pig, and a dead-corpse buried for nearly a century.

Common sense and chilling documents sent to the FBI by these authors discredit official explanations for this pandemic, and this is not the first time this kind of accident has happened. The laboratory sourced 1977 outbreak of H1N1, a virus that went extinct for 20 years was recently acknowledged in the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine. Boycott Safeway Now!

In many Safeway stores, persuasion begins at the door. A teen, knowing nothing about vaccines, hands you a flier encouraging you to visit the pharmacy for your "impulse flu shot." He excuses himself for his ignorance using the Nuremberg defense, "I'm just doing my job."

Safeway customers never learn their pharmacists know little about the H1N1 vaccine.Proprietary ingredients in these vaccines are purposely undisclosed by Burd's partners, the vaccine makers, including Novartis, CSL, Baxter, and Glaxo-SmithKlein. Thus, the inoculations contraindications are missing from Safeway's pharmacists brains.

When on a recent visit to Safeway, Ms. Kane asked the pharmacist if he would take the shot. He replied, I am not going to lie, no, I won't take the vaccine. Five minutes later the man pleasantly provided the flu shot to a customer conned by the promotion to save 10% on her next grocery bill; so the impulse inoculation would cost her less than $20. This recession savvy promotion at check-out got her to take the shot.

Discounted injections are most profitable as they secure people's dependency on the store's pharmacy. Common vaccine and drug side effects last for years, and prescribed medicines generate greater toxicity causing additional diseases. Experts shudder to think vaccine ingredients include toxic oils, heavy metals, poisonous chemicals, anti-HIV spermicides, and (in the UK) a cancer virus believed liked to the origin of AIDS called SV40.

Incredibly, the live genetically-engineered H1N1flu viruses in Safeway's vaccines are expected to mutate rapidly with other circulating viruses including flu strains, common cancer viruses like Epstein Barr, and even HIV, potentially yielding new more deadly pandemics rivaling AIDS and the 1918 Spanish Flu.

As far as medical doctors are concerned, Safeway stores are considered competitors or travel medicine providers (TMPs), according to the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). You get what you pay for, one official told us wishing to remain anonymous. Safeway is hiring these untrained and unqualified TMPs to administer these risky vaccines.

One of Safeway's former pharmacists explained that their best druggists are fired whenever they raise reasonable objections to vaccinations. Thus, Safeway's tenured pharmacists tend to remain lame.

For all the above reasons, an immediate lasting boycott of Safeway is indicated.

Deadly Vaccine Additives Not Disclosed

Safeway is heralding the new H1N1 flu vaccines for pregnant women despite the spermicides in these vaccines being linked by scientists to birth defects and spontaneous abortions. A main ingredient in the European injections is MF59TM with nonoxynol-9 spermicide. According to science, the MF59 with squalene alone might harm or even kill 59-out-of-60 people who buy into the stores propaganda.

Safeway's propagandists are none other than David Rockefeller's partnered media moguls: Rupert Murdock, Mortimor Zuckerman, and Thomas Glocer--the worlds premiere mind-setters. Their companies, include Time Warner, FOX and Reuters are serving psychological operations for global depopulation. They all subscribe to the Population Council of the City of New York founded and still funded by Rockefeller entities. Their newswires neglect these deadly ties to Rockefeller cronies that include The Business Council, The Population Council, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR), and the Partnership for New York City (PNYC) that was chartered by the British Royal family. These partners promote deadly vaccines, allegedly for humanities salvation, creating immunological destruction for widespread depopulation.

Especially implicated in this conspiracy tying mainstream media to mass murder in medicine is the vaccine oil adjuvant made by the Chiron Company. Hideously toxic and unlicensed for use in the U.S, the rest of the brainwashed world is opting for poisoning by Chiron's MF59, among 2693 different chemicals produced by this company for the petrochemical-pharmaceutical cartel. Chiron was criminally investigated in 2004 when millions of doses of its flu vaccines were contaminated with bacteria. The company then hired Enron's attorney, Washington defense lawyer Robert S. Bennett, to defend its position.

More recently, Chiron was acquired by Novartis, another drug giant joining Merck, Pfizer, Glaxo-SmithKlein, CSL, and other PNYC and Business Council members advancing American Health Care Reform ala Safeway's Burd.


Accept swine flu vaccine or we'll imprison you - UK gov

Fausty has it.

The short version is that the Health and Safety Executive is considering forcing everybody in the country to take the swine flu vaccine under threat of imprisonment. Never mind the fact that the vaccine may actually increase the likelihood of contracting H1N1. The governments are all deciding that your body actually belongs to them and they feel they have the right to force this vaccine on you.

In the United States, Massachusetts is pushing for something similar (trans-Atlantic synchronised tyranny).
A new law just passed in Massachusetts imposes fines of up to $1000 per day and up to a 30 day jail sentence for not obeying authorities during a public health emergency. So if you are instructed to take the swine flu vaccine in Massachusetts and you refuse, you could be facing fines that will bankrupt you and a prison sentence on top of that.
Also in the States, Michigan had a little issue with babysitters;

It takes a village, right? Remember when you were a kid and the next door neighbor looked after you for an hour or so until your parents got back from shopping or work? Remember when your neighbor might even pick you up from school at one time or another? Remember that your parents returned the favor whenever it was necessary? Remember when neighbors felt a responsibility to each other? Well thank God we don’t have to rely on friends and neighbors any more. After all, we have the glorious state to take care of us now.

We have our fathers and mothers in government to watch out for us. Who needs neighbors? This is what has happened in the people’s state of Michigan where a kindly maternal woman is being ground under the iron boot heel of authorities from the State of Michigan because she dared to watch her neighbor’s children for about 40 minutes before school each weekday in violation of the state’s child daycare center registration laws.

Shockingly this poor woman is being threatened by the goosesteppers of the child welfare department of the Badger State — an apt name in this case — because she did not get a childcare license for watching her neighbor’s kids for the 40 minutes before the the bus arrives each morning.

Just like a little issue in Britain;

A review has been ordered into the case of two policewomen who have been told they are breaking the law by caring for each other's children.

Detective Constable Leanne Shepherd, 32, who has a two-year-old daughter Edie was ordered to end her childcare arrangement with her friend DC Lucy Jarrett who also has a toddler, Amy, aged three.

DC Shepherd said the experience was so traumatic that she would not have any more children.

The pair, who share a full-time job, had been looking after each other’s children for two-and-a-half years so both could work 10 hour days, twice a week.

Children's Minister Vernon Coaker said he wanted his department to review the case although he insisted the Childcare Act 2006 was in place 'to ensure the safety and wellbeing of all children'.
Yeah yeah whatever. What they mean is it was put in place to give the state power over children. Believe me when I say this, the U.S. government and the UK are following the same masters, over the years I have seen soooo many instances of the same tyrannical regulations being put into place by both apparently 'sovereign' nations. It is almost like there is a secret government above both, giving them the orders...

But that is just CRAZY CONSPIRACY THEORY right?

State propaganda "to make people docile"

BEIJING – When the deputy editor of China's Nan Guo Morning Post, Liu Yuan, first heard details of the death of a 15-year-old boy at a camp to cure Internet addiction, he knew he had a powerful story – and a public responsibility.

The details were shocking.

The boy had been dropped off at the camp by his parents on Aug. 1 about 2 p.m. and less than 14 hours later he was dead – savagely beaten by camp "trainers." Locals later learned the camp was an unregistered business that apparently benefited from state money.

Liu dispatched a reporter and the Post broke the story Aug. 4, revealing that 12 people had been arrested and the camp shut down.

Internet addiction among Chinese youth is a serious problem, according to state media.

The news swept across the Internet like a summer storm, and soon, national media followed.

It was public service journalism of a high order, and further investigation revealed many children at the camp had been beaten.

In other countries, Liu might have received praise, a raise or perhaps a promotion – maybe even an award.

Instead, he lost his job.

Local Communist leaders felt the story had shamed the city – and made them look inept.

The local office of the party's propaganda department, responsible for keeping a tight rein on the media, removed Liu from his position.

Liu might have intended to "serve the people" – to borrow a phrase from Mao Zedong – but local leaders felt he hadn't served the party.

Such is the upside-down world of journalism in the world's most populous country, where watchdog journalists are kept on tight leashes and the interests of the party are always paramount.

Scholars say that aside from the People's Liberation Army – which is directly accountable to the Communist Party of China – there is no more powerful and important administrative branch than the sprawling, bureaucratic establishment known as the Central Propaganda Department.

While its inner operations are highly secretive, its main tasks are well known: control information, instruct the masses and mobilize them when necessary – all in the service of the party.

The department has offices that extend down to provincial, municipal and even county levels, across the country.

From a distance, China appears to be a rapidly modernizing country.

But the Communist government hasn't let go of the reins of its propaganda effort since the day it took power 60 years ago.

"It's absolutely essential to maintaining one-party rule," notes Li Datong, one of China's most respected and outspoken journalists, who rankles at such control.

"The aim of the department is to make people docile," he says, "by brainwashing them ... and that's what the party does."

According to Anne-Marie Brady, a New Zealand political scientist and Chinese propaganda specialist, the department's reach is so broad and so deep that it has, "a central guiding role over the whole of Chinese society."

Through its tentacles, the department controls virtually every means of information distribution in the country: newspapers, books, broadcast outlets, the Internet, mobile phones, education, culture, film – just about everything.

For your information, the UK government has a media blackout order that it can use to 'protect the governments interests'. I can't remember what it's called though. Blair used it to stop the media reporting on BAE funding hookers and cocaine for Saudi arms buyers a few years ago. Anyway, my point is if you think the UK government does not have its own propaganda arm, along with a network of state-serving quangos, fake charities and media fronts, you are mistaken.

Women are the biggest misogynists

When I was growing up, the only girl among four brothers, my mother was always going on at me (and only me) about being 'nice'.

Girls had to be nice to everyone. Boys didn't share these restrictions. If someone wasn't nice to them, they certainly weren't going to be nice back.

But nice girls like me - well, we had no choice in the matter.

As with many things my mother told me, it is only decades later that I can see what good sense she spoke.

Because when you liberate girls - and women - to say what they really think about everyone else without censure or fear of disapproval, then you let the struggle for supremacy among females out of the bag.

It is an ugly and mean way of behaving - and I believe it is stripping away the bonds that hold females together as friends.

My mother kept on at me so tiresomely when I was a little girl because she knew female rivalry started young. My brothers would be encouraged to compete with each other at games and sports, while I was taught that comparing myself with others was not good for girls.

I know she would recoil in horror at the way young girls now eye each other up in public, checking out the colour of their Converse trainers or the Claire's Accessories bow in their hair.

I have watched my nine-yearold daughter pass a girl of a similar age in the street and they are like two stereotypical jealous women in a production of Carmen - all narrowed eyes and furrowed brows as they slowly look from the feet to the face and back again, often with accompanying adults blithely unaware.
Read the comments! It says what I have been saying for years, and will always say. Women are always so quick to label men 'misogynists' for two main reasons, first, to shame the man into giving her what she wants and two, she is projecting her own hatred of women onto him.

Merck employees had "hit list" of doctors they sought to "neutralize"

(NaturalNews) Previously secret documents that surfaced at a Vioxx court case in April of this year reveal pharmaceutical giant Merck maintained a "hit list" of doctors to be "neutralized" for speaking out against Vioxx. Although this story was reported on NaturalNews and other sites in April, Merck's involvement in the recent round of swine flu vaccines raises new questions regarding Merck's behavior towards its critics (see below).

As was reported in The Australian, documents that have surfaced in the Federal Court in Melbourne expose the criminal intent of Merck staffers who admitted they intended to "stop funding to institutions" and "interfere with academic appointments." (These actions are highly illegal, by the way.)

According to on-the-record testimony in this Australian trial, one Merck employee said, in referring to the doctors on the hit list, "We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live..."

That sounds a lot like a mob boss ordering a hit on a competing street thug, doesn't it?

At least eight clinical investigators were threatened or intimidated by Merck, the court heard in testimony. This is congruent with the many reports of academic intimidation by Merck that have already been published on and other news outlets. The picture of Merck that emerges from these revelations is a company run by thugs who deal with dissent by seeking to destroy the lives and careers of academics who dare to tell the truth about Merck's dangerous drugs.


Sunday, 27 September 2009

EUs GESTAPO: “EUROGENDFOR_EU’s International Military Police Force (EGF) Can Squash Public Disobedience *

H/T centurean2

EU’s International Military Police Force (EGF) Can Squash Public Disobedience *

Wise Up Journal
By Gabriel O’Hara

Don’t worry about French UN troops, Spanish UN troops, Romanian UN troops or any other UN troops being used to quell rebellions in western nations due to bank bailouts or any other unpopular or corrupt acts by government. Not when you have the international military police force at the hands of the EU. Never heard of it? Read below.

The EU’s military police force can be deployed to squash public disobedience making sure the the status quo – otherwise called “public order” – is maintained keeping the public in order for it’s managers.


Saturday, 26 September 2009

No to EU!

From my email inbox.


Dear friends & supporters,

we get in touch with you again because you signed the petition "Irish friends vote no for me" last year.

Unfortunately, the Irish government and the EU did not respect the Irish vote against the Lisbon treaty. Instead, the Irish people should vote again "in the right way" now on October 2nd 2009.

In order to convince the Irish electorate to vote Yes, their own government and the EU Council have made - legally non-binding - promises regarding neutrality, their own EU commissioner, tax law and abortion. However, they will be voting a second time on exactly the same treaty as before.

In our view, it is just as undemocratic to have an electorate vote on the same issue twice as it is to simply ignore the three previous plebiscites.

That´s why we launched a new campaign website for a peaceful, social, ecological and democratic Europe:

Please, have a look at our website, sign the new petition and spread the info! Help us to stop this undemocratic treaty!

Attached you´ll find a web banner which can be freely used to promote our campain. Thanks again for your support!

Yours faithfully,

Paula Polak, Christian Felber & Stephan Siber


Tuesday, 22 September 2009

Microchips in humans, conditioning.

Patients will be fitted with a microchip in their shoulder to remind them to take their medicine, under a new scheme being developed by a drugs company.

Older people will be given pills containing a harmless microchip that sends a signal to the chip in the shoulder when the pill is taken.

Note that 'harmless' addition. Sounds like a press release or those corporately funded fake articles.

But if the pill is not taken by the forgetful patient, the chip in the shoulder will then send a text to a carer or the patient to remind them.

Silly patient, helpful microchips in humans!

Swiss pharmaceutical group Norvatis is developing the electronic pill that it hopes will reduce the number of patients who have to be supervised taking their medicine.

Joe Jiminez, head of pharmaceuticals at Novartis, said tests of the 'chip in the pill' to a shoulder receiver chip had been carried out on 20 patients.

Wow, that is a massive test.

The experiment with a drug that lowers blood pressure had increased the amount of times patients had taken their medicine on time from 30 per cent to 80 per cent in six months.

Drug companies are keen to improve 'compliance' rates among patients as most end up not taking their correct dosages because of unpleasant side effects or a failure to gain symptoms quickly.

I would suggest these 'forgetful patients' look up alternative options, and avoid Big Pharma as much as they can. Even if this is useful, in my opinion this is another conditioning exercise. The idea of human implantable microchips is not new and is one of the endgame strategies of the global governance cabal.

The entire human population microchipped. This is the reason for the simultaneous creations of centralised, inter-operable surveillance databases through the nations of the world. They will be administered by supra-national agencies (EU, UN etc) and eventually merged into one global system. Total Information Awareness.

The Koran, explained.

At last, a readable and honest guide to the book that inspires terrorists worldwide: the Koran.

The Conservative Book Club has made my new book, The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran, a main selection for this month. Here is their review of the book:

If we don't know the Koran, we can't defeat the jihadists: Osama bin Laden, the masterminds of 9/11 and those who have perpetrated the over 13,000 jihad attacks worldwide since 9/11 repeatedly point to it as their inspiration and authority, explaining that they're committing acts of terrorism and hate because of it. Yet the Koran is not an easy read -- it has been called "wrist-slittingly boring," as well as confusing, contradictory, and muddled. But Robert Spencer reads the Koran so that you don't have to! Now, in The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran, Spencer, the bestselling author and Islam expert, shows exactly what's in the Koran, and why every military and intelligence official -- and every American -- should be concerned about this revered and reviled holy book. This witty and breezily written guide to the Koran explains who those who have vowed to destroy us think they are, what they think they're doing, and what they hope to accomplish.

Spencer explains what the Koran says about who Infidels are and what must be done about them; its appallingly harsh teachings on women; what it really says about warfare against Infidels; its strange teachings on Christians and Christianity; and its relentless demonization of the people whom the Koran identifies as the chief enemies of the Muslims: the Jews. He shows how the Koran developed, why central Muslim claims about it are false, and even provides a revealing and disquieting glimpse into the Hadith, the traditions of Muhammad that for Muslims worldwide are second in authority only to the Koran itself.

A huge number of policy decisions are predicated upon the assumption that the Koran teaches peace, and that those who brandish Korans and commit violence are misunderstanding their own religion and perverting the teachings of their own holy book. These include U.S. government postures toward Pakistan and Egypt; immigration matters; airport security procedures; military strategies in Iraq and Afghanistan; domestic anti-terror policies; and our acquiescence to Saudi Arabia's Islamic proselytizing campaign in America and many other countries. That's why The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran is so urgently needed: it shows how and why U.S. policies in these areas are not only wrong but dangerous to our national security -- and sounds a clarion call for a restoration of sanity on these issues in our national security establishment.

Proof: the Koran is just about the opposite of a "book of peace":

* Why most government and media analysts dare not even question the assumption that the Koran is peaceful

* How sacred texts are not entirely determined by what the faithful wish to see in them

* Infidels: why Allah hates them, and what he has in store for them -- straight from the Koran

* The strange story of how the Koran was compiled -- and the explosive significance of the existence of alternate versions

* The worst sin of all for Muslims: it's worse than murder, worse than rape, worse than genocide, and you're probably committing it

* The Muslim claim that the Koranic text was never altered -- why it's false, and why this matters

* Why it is so easy for non-Muslim readers reading English translations of the Koran to miss some of its most violent and worrisome passages

* The passages of the Koran that mandate warfare against unbelievers: why in traditional Islam they take precedence over more peaceful passages

* The little-noted and violent corollary to the Koran's famous passages forbidding the killing of innocent people

* But doesn't the Koran promise salvation to Jews and Christians? The truth about this celebrated passage

* How the Koran retells stories of the Biblical prophets but alters them to support Muhammad's claim to be a prophet

* Moses: the Koran's frequent retellings of the Exodus story -- and the all-important element of that story that the Muslim book leaves out every time

* The Islamic prophet Muhammad: why the Koran is essentially all about him

* Telling signs that the Koran was not delivered from heaven in pristine form, but was compiled from earlier Jewish, Christian, and pagan sources

* Koranic Jew-hatred: proof that Islamic anti-Semitism is not an import from Christianity, as many have claimed

* Are the Koran's violent commandments are largely meaningless, since similar ones are found in the Bible?

* The surprising and disquieting truth behind Islam's professed respect for other religions and reverence for their central figures

* The extraordinary implications of the Koran's preposterous teachings about Abraham, Moses and Jesus

* The alarming teachings of the Koran on women: how it reduces women to the status of commodities, and even teaches that women are deficient intellectually

* The Koran: does it really contain miraculous prophecies and other evidence of divine origin?

* The strange Islamic phenomena of "temporary wives" and "temporary husbands" -- and how justification for both comes from the Koran

* Love your enemies -- and other things the Koran doesn't say

* Barack Obama's June 2009 speech to the Islamic world: an object lesson in the hazards of not understanding the Koran

* How mistakes and false assumptions about Islam and the Koran is today leading the U.S. to make serious foreign policy errors

* What Infidels can and must do to defend free societies against those who take the Koran's message of violence and supremacism to heart

"Meticulous, comprehensive, indispensable. 'I read the Koran so you don't have to,' Spencer writes, but even for those of us who have read the Koran, this is a richly illuminating work." -- Bruce Bawer, author of Surrender: Appeasing Islam, Sacrificing Freedom and While Europe Slept.

"Governing officials and media spokesmen may ignore Spencer's warnings, but they do so at their own risk, because Islamic jihadists are not ignoring what's in the Koran, and are working to destroy our freedoms in obedience to Koranic dictates. In illuminating for Westerners exactly what the Koran teaches, Spencer has performed a valuable service in the defense of Western civilization against the Islamic jihad." -- Geert Wilders, Member of Parliament and Chairman of the Party for Freedom (PVV), the Netherlands

"Unlike most of today's self-styled experts, Robert Spencer won't tell you that 'slay the idolaters wherever you find them' really means 'love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.' In The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran, Spencer shows once again that he is America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism, insisting that we come to grips with the words behind the ideology that fuels international terror." -- Andrew C. McCarthy, senior fellow at the National Review Institute and author of Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad.

"Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate's New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty. In our epoch of intellectual jihadism, this honest book is essential to understand the challenges of the twenty-first century." -- Bat Ye'or, author of Eurabia; The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam and Islam and Dhimmitude

"Tony Blair calls the Koran 'progressive [and] humanitarian' but Robert Spencer has actually read the scripture and begs to differ. In an informed, sardonic antidote to the usual soft-peddling of the Koran, he concludes that its actual contents should alarm infidels and prompt them to defend their 'freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the legal equality of all people.' " -- Daniel Pipes, director, Middle East Forum

"For 1,400 years Muslim leadership spread misinformation and covered up what is in the Koran, even criminalizing exposing the truth or asking questions. The truth is too scary for many, both Muslims and non-Muslims. I thank Robert Spencer for bringing the truth of what is in the Koran to non-Muslims." -- Nonie Darwish, ex-Muslim and author of Now They Call Me Infidel

"This book is an incisive analysis of how Islamic jihadists read the Koran and understand it to be commanding them to wage war against non-Muslims. Military and intelligence analysts, as well as all Americans interested in protecting our freedoms, will find The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran to be a valuable guide to the thought processes and core beliefs of Muslim terrorists." -- Steven Emerson, author of American Jihad

Monday, 21 September 2009

EU to demand Britain let in all asylum seekers

You cannot legally be an asylum seeker from a stable country, and we are an island the last time I checked.

Europe's Justice Commissioner will today demand a change in the law to allow 'Britain-obsessed' asylum seekers into the UK at their earliest convenience.

Jacques Barrot, a former French minister, believes the reform would assist migrants who are sleeping rough in Calais, waiting for a chance to enter Britain.

This includes hundreds who will be evicted this week from the notorious 'Jungle' squat in the town, which riot police plan to destroy.

Under current law the asylum seekers should be sent back to the country where they entered the EU.
So why aren't they then?

But, referring to a proposal which would allow foreigners to claim asylum in any EU country they want, Mr Barrot said: 'In order for the closure of the Jungle to make sense, it is necessary to share the burden between France and Great Britain.

'There should be a solidarity within the EU over asylum.

Fine, send them elsewhere then, Europe is a big place. Britain is one of the most densely populated countries in Europe and we have enough of our own problems which we must give priority too, otherwise what the fuck are we paying the government for?

They play a nightly game of cat and mouse with the police as they try to board lorries and trains heading for Dover.

Police sources in the town have confirmed that CRS riot control officers supported by soldiers would move in to the camp, the largest of many, with batons and flame throwers on Tuesday, the day after Ramadan ends.

'Many of those living in the camp are Muslims from countries like Afghanistan and Iraq who want to get to Britain,' said one senior officer.

We all know why they want to come here, so cut the shit. Britain has already absorbed a vast amount of seekers economic migrants, attracted to the welfare state, while bringing their barbaric Islamic beliefs with them, with their rape Jihads and other resulting violence and community segregation, as is to be expected by anyone who has read the Koran.

This brings me to another query.

Why are immigrants with no history, connection or contribution to Britain entitled to taxpayer funded welfare the instant they get off the boat/ coach/ train. Local people are turned away from social housing options, saying 'the list is full' while entire areas change cultural and ethnic composition.

Divide and conquer.

People need to stop making excuses for this government, this isn't incompetence, it is cultural warfare. They are engaged in breaking down Britain's centuries old cohesion, along with the destruction of the nuclear family, as government policy.

There may be trouble... ahead.....

Leaked UN report claims swine flu could "kill millions" and cause "anarchy" in poor nations

Unless we give Big Pharma billions. Yes, it sounds like a ransom note from the bad guys in a James Bond movie, and yes, sounds like a big fucking scam. Scams that can only be property promoted because of globalist institutions like the Rockefeller created UN.


(NaturalNews) A UN report leaked to The Observer claims that swine flu could "kill millions" of people in poor nations and cause a total breakdown of society unless wealthy nations come up with US$1.5 billion to pay for pandemic vaccines and anti-viral drugs. It warns that the fragile economies of developing nations could be completely destroyed by the breakdown of social services, infrastructure and medical care.

The report specifically says:

"Countries where health services are overburdened by diseases, such as HIV/Aids, tuberculosis and malaria, will have great difficulty managing the surge of cases. And if the electricity and water sectors are not able to maintain services, this will have serious implications for the ability of the health sector to function. ...If suppliers of fuel, food, telecommunications, finance or transport services have not developed plans as to how they would continue to deliver their services, the consequences could be significantly intensified."

This UN report identifies 75 countries that remain vulnerable to this chaos scenario: 6 nations in South America, 21 nations from Asia and 40 in Africa. The only way to prevent the possible collapse of these nations, the report says, is for this $1.5 billion to be spent on vaccines and anti-viral drugs.

There is no mention in the report of teaching the citizens of poor nations how to use their own local indigenous medicine, or how to get more vitamin D from sunlight, or even how to boost their immune system health through dietary changes. The suggestions of the entire report come down to just two things: Vaccines and anti-viral drugs.

Just another UN medical scam

So what's the real story behind all this? All be blunt: In my opinion, this report is just another Big Pharma scam. It's designed to scare people into sending even more money to the drug companies to buy their drugs and vaccines. The threat of the "complete collapse" of these poorer nations is designed to leverage first-world fear to motivate these nations to spend more money on precisely the things that make the pharmaceutical industry wealthy.

There's no doubt that the citizens of poor nations need help improving their health, but that should be accomplished through education and the use of local medicinal plants, not through the chemical intervention of greedy corporations from first-world nations. The last thing the people of poor nations need is yet another imperialist band of profit-minded corporations telling them to get injected.

Haven't we already learned what happens when drug companies are allowed to exploit the people of poor nations? Pfizer, for example, exploited the children of Nigeria to run illegal drug experiments ( This cost the drug company $75 million in a class action settlement, and it cemented the company's reputation as an evil killer in the minds of many.

It's obvious to the leaders of such nations that drug companies have no interest in actually helping their people; they're only interested in exploiting them for profit. This UN scare story is just another first-world tactic to funnel yet more money to the drug companies who will only harm the populations of poor nations.

Friday, 18 September 2009

One Happy Family

What. The. Fuck.

What do I get the feeling the globalist pondscum are all singing from the same songsheet?

When in the Caliphate...

That protest against the mosque in East London was all wrong, all wrong.

The dirty kaffirs should have just fire-bombed the fucking thing, then maybe arrest Muslims and kill them in custody.

It is what the Religion of Peace would do, when they are not imprisoning women for being raped, that is.

Thursday, 17 September 2009

THIS IS GOVERNMENT - Ian Parker-Joseph

From Ian Parker-Joseph, Leader of the UK Libertarian Party

Posted here verbatim.

The Ant and the Grasshopper is a fable attributed to Aesop, providing a moral lesson about hard work and preparation. In 2002 someone adapted that fable (attribution sought) to show the utter waste, despair and stupidity that our political masters have visited upon us in the name of Government.



The squirrel works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building and improving his house and laying up supplies for the winter.

The grasshopper thinks he's a fool, and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the squirrel is warm and well fed.

The shivering grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.




The squirrel works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks he's a fool, and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the squirrel is warm and well fed.

A social worker finds the shivering grasshopper, calls a press conference and demands to know why the squirrel should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others less fortunate, like the grasshopper, are cold and starving.

The BBC shows up to provide live coverage of the shivering grasshopper; with cuts to a video of the squirrel in his comfortable warm home with a table laden with food.

The British press inform people that they should be ashamed that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so, while others have plenty.

The Labour Party, Greenpeace, Animal Rights and The Grasshopper Council of GB demonstrate in front of the squirrel's house. The BBC, interrupting a cultural festival special from Notting Hill with breaking news, broadcasts a multi-cultural choir singing 'We shall overcome'.

Ken Livingstone rants in an interview with Trevor McDonald that the squirrel got rich off the backs of grasshoppers, and calls for an immediate tax hike on the squirrel to make him pay his 'fair share' and increases the charge for squirrels to enter inner London .

In response to pressure from the media, the Government drafts the Economic Equity and Grasshopper anti Discrimination Act, retroactive to the beginning of the summer.

The squirrel's taxes are reassessed. He is taken to court and fined for failing to hire grasshoppers as builders for the work he was doing on his home and an additional fine for contempt when he told the court the grasshopper did not want to work. The grasshopper is provided with a council house, financial aid to furnish it and an account with a local taxi firm to ensure he can be socially mobile. The squirrel's food is seized and re distributed to the more needy members of society, in this case the grasshopper.

Without enough money to buy more food, to pay the fine and his newly imposed retroactive taxes, the squirrel has to downsize and start building a new home. The local authority takes over his old home and utilises it as a temporary home for asylum seeking cats who had hijacked a plane to get to Britain as they had to share their country of origin with mice. On arrival they tried to blow up the airport because of Britain 's apparent love of dogs.

The cats had been arrested for the international offence of hijacking and attempted bombing but were immediately released because the police fed them pilchards instead of salmon whilst in custody. Initial moves to return them to their own country were abandoned, because it was feared they would face death by the mice. The cats devise and start a scam to obtain money from people's credit cards.

A Panorama special shows the grasshopper finishing up the last of the squirrel's food, though spring is still months away, while the council house he is in, crumbles around him because he hasn't bothered to maintain the house. He is shown to be taking drugs. Inadequate government funding is blamed for the grasshoppers' drug 'illness'.

The cats seek recompense in the British courts for their treatment since arrival in UK .

The grasshopper gets arrested for stabbing an old dog during a burglary to get money for his drugs habit. He is imprisoned but released immediately because he has been in custody for a few weeks. He is placed in the care of the probation service to monitor and supervise him.. Within a few weeks he has killed a guinea pig in a botched robbery.

A commission of enquiry, that will eventually cost £10,000,000 and state the obvious, is set up. Additional money is put into funding a drug rehabilitation scheme for grasshoppers and legal aid for lawyers representing asylum seekers is increased. The government praises the asylum-seeking cats for enriching Britain 's multicultural diversity, and dogs are criticised by the government for failing to befriend the cats.

The grasshopper dies of a drug overdose. The usual sections of the press blame it on the obvious failure of government to address the root causes of despair arising from social inequity and his traumatic experience of prison. They call for the resignation of a government minister.

The cats are paid a million pounds each because their rights were infringed when the government failed to inform them there were mice in the United Kingdom .

The squirrel, the dogs and the victims of the hijacking, the bombing, the burglaries and robberies have to pay an additional percentage on their credit cards to cover losses. Their taxes are increased to pay for law and order, and they are told that they will have to work beyond 65 because of a shortfall in government funds.


If you want to continue with this form of social madness, just keep on voting for the same old political parties. Labour, Conservatives and LibDems all see a lot of mileage and patronage in maintaining this kind status quo, where the lazy and can't be arsed are making lifestyle choices at the expense of the productive members of society. They are frightened to confront the EU, frightened to tackle the unions and the money laundering, frightened to take on the Fabians, in fact the Conservatives are now part of the problem.

But if you want a Government that will butt out of your lives, leaving you to be innovative and productive if you want to and to keep those rewards which you have worked for, where the lazy and feckless will struggle because they are lazy and feckless, then the Libertarian Party is the one for you.

The Libertarian Party would like to see much of the natural order of things restored, but for those grasshoppers who are unable to work, to prepare for the winter, where genuine help is needed, then help through government programmes would be available because we care, not because the lazy can make it a lifestyle choice at your expense.

Remember, no matter what the EU and Politicians think, it IS your Life, it IS your Country, and it IS your Choice.

"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." ~Thomas B. Reed

Wednesday, 16 September 2009

Government spending. See where how your hard earned money is pissed up the wall

Again from The Guardian, must have cut the fluoride from their drinking water or something.
Gordon Brown steeled himself and finally uttered the c-word at the TUC
on Tuesday – which means that cuts in public spending are now being
talked openly about by all three main parties. But signing up to the
principle of retrenchment in general terms is easy; the politicians
become much more coy when it gets to the specific question of exactly
what they would cut.
Visit the article, it has spreadsheets and (out of date) graphics and shit.

Personally, I believe a government-wide audit needs to be undertaken, with one simple rule. If we fired this person/ stopped this funding/ closed this department, would the public suffer?

All the middle managers, the suits, jobs for the boys, entire fucking quangos, cut the Common Purpose scum out of the NHS, streamline the welfare state. Cap child benefit at one child. Restrict social systems (welfare, housing etc) to people with British citizenship. None of this globalist 'points-system' which makes no distinction between people, local or foreign, friend or foe, contributor or not.

Repeal the thousands of laws that do nothing but give the State an excuse to get in peoples business, and then fine them. Get out of the EU. The police would be freed up to chase actual criminals who infringe on someone else's property or freedom, as opposed to 'criminal' acts of dropped apple cores, or taking fucking photographs. Scrap all the cushy perks for perps in prison (quite catchy that). Cap public sector pensions, salaries, link them to interest rates and the private sector.

More authority down to council level. All the central government should be doing is sorting out the National Defense and Foreign Policy.

As long as you don't violate anyone else's property or freedom, then it is none of the states' fucking business.

100,000's of public sector workers would be upset. Big fucking deal. This government has indebted the entire country, and the next generation. Fuck everybody, it's Rock and Roll time!

Man Plays God IV. Rothschild´s 4. Reich: CO2-driven Slaughterhouse For “Useless Eaters´”

Summary: According to the insider, George Hunt, Rothschilds New World Order has been in control of the environmental movement since its birth in 1972. The idea of CO2-combating was put forward in 1987 by Edmund de Rothschild - "it means money," he said. Furthermore, he suggested a 2nd Marshall plan: 44 billion. dollars from western taxpayers were paid through his Frankfurt bank to rescue the Soviet rubel! The enormously rich Rothschild family has taken complete control of world economy and policy. It has bribed politicians to dance to their tune, and his concerns are in control of governments through lobbying. Mussolini defined such a state as fascism.


The Guardian says something sensible

In the Guardian today, Anthony Evans writes;
Don't regulate banking – liberalise it

Barack Obama's speech on Monday to Wall Street outlines an overhaul of the regulatory regime. On the anniversary of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers,
politicians from both sides of the Atlantic are looking to remodel
capitalism. The thirst for greater regulation is strong, united around
Gordon Brown's judgment
that "laissez-faire has had its day … the old idea that the markets
were efficient and could work themselves out by themselves are gone".

notion that the present financial system is "laissez-faire" is, of
course, ludicrous. At present, we have a nationalised organisation that
holds a state-granted monopoly on the issuance of currency. If this
were any industry other than finance, the Bank of England would be seen
as the Soviet-style planning board that it is.

Complete and utter sense? I'm shocked, go read the whole thing, it is only short. Almost as much fun as reading the brainwashed commentators who believe big state owned-run everything is the only solution. Fucking pussies.

Maybe Mr Evans took a look at the Libertarian Party manifesto...

Tuesday, 15 September 2009

The Truth about Global Warming stories

Remember this,
"The threat of environmental crisis will be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order." [Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in "A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind", by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5.]
Everyone knows the term New World Order alludes to a global centralised technocratic super government. Like the EU but global and even worse.

Now this is released.
A United Nations document on “climate change” that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

This is the main thrust of the climate change scam. Pushing for a supranational legal framework, specifically designed to usurp the sovereignty of nation states but by proxy, the individual sovereignty of us all.

I add the following quotes for your consideration.
David Rockefeller Sept. 23, 1994 "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
Note the image on the right of the blog, of the newspaper.

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -David Rockefeller, from his own book, Memoirs.

We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” — Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto determination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

"The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government ..." -- AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92.

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." — SIR JOSIAH STAMP, (President of the Bank of England in the 1920's, the second richest man in Britain)

“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” — Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg

"I am convinced that the agreement [Bretton Woods] will enthrone a world dictatorship of private finance more complete and terrible than a Hitlerite dream. It offers no solution of world problems, but quite blatantly sets up controls which will reduce the smaller nations to vassal states and make every government the mouthpiece and tool of International Finance. It will undermine and destroy the democratic institutions of this country - in fact as effectively as ever the Fascist forces could have done - and will undoubtedly present a new menace, endangering world peace. World collaboration of private financial interests can only mean mass unemployment, slavery, misery, degradation and financial destruction. -- Labor Minister of Australia, Eddie Ward, during the inception of the World Bank and Bretton Woods, he gave this warning.

All throughout history, tyrants have sought global domination. Our time is no different. The human race struggles against itself, seeking to drag itself away from these primitive insecurities, trying to quench them with never ending power and wealth. As far as Britain is concerned, people should educate themselves on a few things. The nature of money, how banks operate, and if you own yourself or if you are a slave to others. I will elaborate on this shortly.

Make no mistake, running serves no purpose whatsoever. We are born to fight for our freedom against parasites, and by God, this is what I shall do!

Religion of Savages gets Stoned

Aceh passes adultery stoning law

Indonesia's province of Aceh has passed a new law making adultery
punishable by stoning to death, a member of the province's parliament
has said.

The law was passed unanimously by Aceh's regional
legislature, said assembly member Bahrom Rasjid....Sharia law was
partially introduced in Aceh in 2001, as part of a government offer to
pacify separatist rebels....

Married people convicted of
adultery can be sentenced to death by stoning. Unmarried people can be
sentenced to 100 lashes with a cane.

The law also imposes severe sentences for rape, homosexuality, alcohol consumption and gambling.
This is the sort of backwards nonsense you expect from Muslims, because their religion is a barbaric backwards religion. Simples! Now let's just cut the foreign fucking aid, like we should do to all countries.

Monday, 14 September 2009

The Truth About the Health Care Bills

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House
Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it
with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law.
I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being
discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than
what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its
implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media
are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care,
particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are
involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion
services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of
the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out
of business and put everyone into a government run system. All
decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal
bureaucrats and most of them will not be health care professionals.
Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of
necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled.


No end to their delusions

Typical fucking Righteous. Legends in their own minds, the lot of them.

Harman 'prepares for leadership fight'

This article, also in the Mail Online explores the issues of the ego epidemic of modern women.

Sunday, 13 September 2009

£405 for HPV vaccine

Work this one out.

High street pharmacy offers cervical cancer vaccine for £405

Study Reveals Serious HPV Vaccine Problems: Fainting, Blood Clots, Death Among Risks

The EU and Global Governance

Here is the link, just go and read it. For all those, pro-EU types and 'our government would never do anything against us' types.

The EU's grand designs: who'd've thought it?

Saturday, 12 September 2009

END OF NATIONS - EU Takeover & the Lisbon Treaty (Film)

From Wise Up Journal

We set out to make a video about the pros and cons of the Lisbon Treaty and found out to our horror the lies, manipulations and deceit behind the EU. From MEPs, legal experts and EU researches the true nature of the EU unfolded, how it really operates from behind closed doors and away from prying eyes. We discovered the massive power grab away from citizens and nations to the elites that is being proposed in this treaty.

Most shocking of all was how our elected representatives are willingly handing us over to this emerging Totalitarian Superstate by deception , propaganda and outright lies.This video details how the structures of the EU really operate, what the full significance of the Lisbon Treaty is and how it is the end of Nations within in the EU. MEPs describe their experience in Brussels and how they are undermined by the real power of the unelected and unaccountable Eurocrats who run the organization. How the politicians are working together for their own selfish needs while being used for a bigger agenda.

Thursday, 10 September 2009

EU to redistribute billions more of our money

The European Commission says the EU should provide
$2-15bn each year to help poor countries protect themselves against
impacts of climate change.

The UN estimates that poor nations
will need about $100bn (£60bn) per year for climate adaptation, with
much of that coming from levies on carbon trading.

Carbon trading is just another false economy that involves almost nothing of actual value to people. Actually penalising people and industries for producing a naturally occurring gas, which in totality accounts for less than half of one percent of the atmosphere! And of course, the increase in the minuscule CO2 emissions does not tally with the actual global temperatures dropping. But lets not let common sense and logic get in the way of global taxation/ civilisation control propaganda okay?

So anthropogenic CO2 is not driving global temperatures but that is not what is important. What is important is that the whole human race realises that they are a burden on Earth and only a super-rich elite controlling the world through supranational legal systems and political institutions can save it.

The commission sees about 40% of the $100bn coming from the global
carbon market that is supposed to emerge from the Copenhagen treaty.

You know, I never really did understand the CO2 market. You pay some elite-owned organisation money to emit CO2, and then what? You emit it anyway. What about the people who cannot afford it (which would be most people on Earth). Well I guess their lives are restricted permanently, forced down to an inferior quality of life, because they are not allowed to do something that may produce a completely natural trace gas. Which just so happens to be critical for photosynthesis.

I smell an NWO rat.

Truthfully though, the most interesting part of this article is this.

"The EU is trying to get away with leaving a tip, rather than paying
its share of the bill to protect the planet's climate," said Joris den
Blanken, climate and energy policy director of Greenpeace-EU.

groups argue that western nations are historically responsible for
causing man-made climate change, and so must bear the brunt of any
"compensation money" for the developing world - a position that is
shared by governments of many poorer countries.

Nowhere in this entire article is there anything remotely resembling democratic representation of the people of the nations of Europe. It is as if the people don't even exist. There is no vote, no choice, just some suits in Brussels deciding how much of our money they should give to other people under the false guise of man-made global warming.

This is the real point of the EU to the elitists. No more messing about with parliaments and national governments. Just tell everyone what to do from above. Kind of like the eye on the pyramid, no?

We need the European Union like a free man needs shackles.

This is what happens when you interfere with families

LONDON (Reuters) - Some children are living in such poverty that
their lives mirror the suffering of those in the "times of Dickens," a
teachers' union leader says.

Lesley Ward, president of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers
(ATL), said some children come from communities with such deprivation
that it is incredibly hard for schools to help rectify.

"There are perfectly healthy children who enter school not yet toilet-trained," Ward told a reception in London.

"Children who cannot dress themselves, children who only know how to
eat with a spoon, and have never sat around a table to enjoy a
home-cooked family meal. Children who don't know who will be at home
when they get home -- if anyone.

Well we all know, one of the primary goals of this government has been the destruction of the nuclear family, to replace it with the mutated socialist state-family. That is, instead of father - mother - children, it is state - mother - children. The biggest additional factor is the welfare system which specifically encourages single mother units, and indeed, actually punishes families where the father is present.

On top of that, the massive financial burden of this corporate socialist state means that anyone that does get around to working is battered by taxes. This makes it harder for those on benefits to get out of the rut they are in. Which is actually the point. The state does not want people wealthy, healthy and independent of them, because the state automatically loses its power over us. So this can only get worse.

Ward said she knew of one pupil who watched from a classroom window
as his father was in handcuffs after his house's front door was kicked

"The reality is that six in 10 poor children live in families where
someone works. That's shocking isn't it -- you go out to work, perhaps
two or even three part-time jobs, and you're still living below the
poverty line," she said.

"Life mirroring the times of Dickens."

She said deprivation caused the problem of "poverty of aspiration,"
with parents seeing little value in education, but she rejected the
notion that teachers just accepted this.

Teaches can only do so much. Broken dependent homes will most likely breed broken dependent offspring. Broken in the sense they cannot think for themselves and dependent on the state for survival.

And that is just how the state wants it.

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

France Mulls CO2 Taxes on Citizens

RELATED: German Government Advisor Proposes Personal CO2 Budget For Everyone On Planet

RELATED: Obama Intimately Tied To Carbon Trading Scam

RELATED: Rothschild Australia and E3 International to take the lead in the global carbon trading market

France Mulls CO2 Taxes on Citizens

James Kanter
New York Times
Monday, September 7, 2009

The French government plans next year to begin making heavy users of household and transport fuels bear more of the tax burden. President Nicolas Sarkozy is expected to say in coming weeks that such a shift is necessary to nudge French citizens toward cleaner alternatives.

The tax would reportedly start at about 14 euros (or $20) for each ton of CO2 emitted, and could rise to levels of around 100 euros ($143) for each ton by 2030. That could mean substantial increases in the price of gasoline and diesel, as well as a sizable jump in the cost of keeping homes warm.

But skeptics say the idea may have less to do with clean energy, and more to do with a desire on the part of Mr. Sarkozy’s government to find new ways to keep the national debt in check.

Full story here.

I guess reducing state spending or borrowing is out of the question. You can't control people with debt if they're not in it! Spend spend spend, borrow some more. The money printers will demand interest too remember, so the state oppresses the people and wrings them dry, squeezing as much out of them as possible. You have to keep in mind that money (to us) represents production, which means it represents out time, which is life. A weeks' pay is a week of your working life gone. They want the money you earn, which is the same as them saying they want your life.

Introduction of carbon tax suggested

Irish Times
Monday, September 7, 2009

The Commission on Taxation has recommended the introduction of a carbon tax to help cut Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions.

In a report published this morning, the commission said this tax should apply to all carbon-based fuels sold for use in Ireland and should be based on the tonnes of CO2 emitted by each fuel. It said the tax could raise €500 million per year.

“The tax should be clearly visible at the point of final consumption to ensure it is not seen as ‘just another tax’”, the report said.

The Commission said a carbon tax would encourage polluters to cut emissions to save money and encourage innovation. “It is fair in the sense that those who choose to pollute the most, pay the most,” it said.

While there should be no preferential rates, businesses who are involved in the Emissions Trading Scheme should be exempt, it said.

Full story here.

Yes, supposedly free, independent countries all around the world start freely, independently pushing the same oppressive schemes.
It is enough to make you think there is a bigger picture to all of this...

Monday, 7 September 2009

I want to like the EU... but I can’t

This has been on the front page all day. Which is nice. Nice to see level headed, healthy skepticism on the undemocratic unaccountable EU project on mainstream websites. I would buy this guy a pint, but I don't have any money left after the dual governments of Britain and the EU finished raping my arse for taxes.

Let me make something clear from the start of this piece: I like Europe and Europeans.

I like the idea of having closer ties to the continent. I think the Channel Tunnel's a great thing. I'm in favour of free trade and, to the extent that it's practical, open borders.

But I have to admit, the jury's out on the European Union and a lot of people feel the same way. There's been a big swing towards anti-EU parties (not just in the UK either) across Europe.

Why? EU supporters tend to claim that people just don't understand Europe. The logical conclusion from this is that they should just shut up and entrust handling it to the people who do, the politicians.

But I don't think people are that daft. If they can understand how a subprime mortgage (a pretty abstract concept in the first place) got sliced and diced and distributed in such a way as to kick off the collapse of the financial system, then they should be able to get a handle on just about anything.

Governments becoming more powerful
I think the real problem is that people feel that political power is becoming ever more distant from them. Governments seem to be getting bigger and more dictatorial and the concerns of individuals seem to be getting lost.

I think the anti-EU vote was an anti-big-government vote. But what might happen if we ended up leaving the EU? Most obviously there's the economic impact.

But what would it be? One thing that's very apparent when you try to find out anything about the EU is that no one is neutral. Everyone wants to spin a line either for or against the whole project, so it's very difficult to get any clear information.

The right-leaning think tank Civitas reckons the best estimates put the annual net cost to the UK of EU membership at £55 billion, but that includes various indirect costs that can be disputed.

So if you want a straight figure that's hard to quibble with, you can just look at our annual net contribution to the EU.

That's the amount of money we put in, minus what we get back in the form of EU spending on things like farm subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), for example. This adds up to £6.4 billion this year, a 60% jump on last year.


Word of advice. When someone tries to get you to sign a legally binding document by deliberately covering up the clauses and by outright lying to you. It is best to say 'no thanks'. When you say no and they come back with 'vote again', that is when you stick up two fingers and tell them to stuff their Forth Reich utopia up their collective arses, sideways.

Sunday, 6 September 2009


For not posting more recently, been experimenting with Ubuntu on my netbook.

For updates on the shit going on, there is always the blog roll feed thing, on the right somewhere.

Friday, 4 September 2009

Barack Obama accused of trying to indoctrinate children with socialism


Before I supply some content of this article, I’ll begin with this Jesuit quote from the 1600’s;

"Give me the child, and I will mould the man."

Remember, as tyrants know, taking control of the minds of the next generation is very important for entrenching their ideology in society. One of the main reasons for the Rockefellers bankrolling state education in the U.S. back in the day, and the same reason Marx called for it.

His plan for a televised address to be shown in classrooms when children return to school next week provoked sparked complaints from parents and fuelled the growing conservative backlash against his leadership.

Critics alleged that the address planned for Tuesday was another example of state interference and so-called "big government" by the Democrat president following his record financial stimulus spending and plans for health care reforms.

Big government? These socialists don’t know anything else. You can’t have a utopia unless the state controls (and becomes) everything. That is the main reason why all governments throughout history have ever grown. To take more control and power away from the only people that matter. You.

Officials across the country fielded irate calls from parents after it was revealed that the federal education department had encouraged schools to make children watch the 15-minute address.

I wonder if they clamped their heads to the TV and dripped hypnotic drugs in their eyes.

In Florida, Jim Greer, the Republican Party chairman, said he was "absolutely appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread President Obama's socialist ideology".

Critics were particularly upset that Arne Duncan, the secretary of education, had written to all head teachers announcing the president's address as a "historic speech" and urging them to build lessons around it.

Students were urged to "write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president".

Yes, unquestioning obedience to leader and state. Where was the last time I read something else like that?

Fuck the president, your job is the pursuit of individual life, liberty and happiness.

Individual freedom, without violating the freedom or property of others. Is all that matters. Anything that violates, that violates everything.

Tuesday, 1 September 2009

Geo-engineering Earth is ‘good idea’

Quack alert.

_46299434_green_fig4[1]A UK Royal Society study has concluded that many engineering proposals to reduce the impact of climate change are "technically possible".

Such approaches could be effective, the authors said in their report.

But they also stressed that the potential of geo-engineering should not divert governments away from their efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

No, must keep up the tax on civilisation and reducing the quality of life for everyone on Earth, elite classes excluded of course.

Such engineering projects could either remove carbon dioxide or reflect the Sun's rays away from the planet.

Fucking hell, did I wake up in a parallel universe? You remove carbon dioxide and what are the plants going to use for photosynthesis? You reflect the Sun’s rays and what are the plants going to use for photosynthesis, you know the process that converts carbon dioxide into organic compounds, especially sugars, using the energy from sunlight.

Suggestions range from having giant mirrors in space, to erecting giant CO2 scrubbers that would "clean up" the air.

This is a typo, what they actually mean is erecting giant carbon tax scams that will suck the productivity out of the human race, something that seems to be alluded to in the next quote (my emphasis).

Of the two basic geo-engineering approaches, the report concluded that those involving the removal of carbon dioxide were preferable, as they effectively return the climate system closer to its pre-industrial state.

That one sentence sums up the entire environmental movement.

Of the carbon removal techniques assessed, three were considered to have most potential:

1. CO2 capture from ambient air: This would be the preferred method, as it effectively reverses the cause of climate change.

2. Enhanced weathering: This aims to enhance natural reactions of CO2 from the air with rocks and minerals. It was identified as a prospective longer-term option.

3. Land use and afforestation: The report found that land-use management could and should play a small but significant role in reducing the growth of atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

This is the best they can come up with? And think of the absurdity of humans trying to control the entire climate. What for? Climate is supposed to change, it is COMPLETELY NATURAL. But like I said, this isn’t about nature, this is about imposing a global regime using the environment as a pretext.

Professor John Shepherd, a researcher from the University of Southampton, chaired the Royal Society's geo-engineering study.

So you know who butters his bread.

He said: "It is an unpalatable truth that unless we can succeed in greatly reducing CO2 emissions, we are headed for a very uncomfortable and challenging climate future.

Horseshit you dip stick.

"Some geo-engineering techniques could have serious unintended and detrimental effects on many people and ecosystems, yet we are still failing to take the only action that will prevent us from having to rely on them.

If it involves reducing quality of life and/ or an ever increasing state to oppress the behaviour and industry of the human race, then it is far from unintended. Still, as far as he is concerned all of that is perfectly acceptable.

Long as it doesn’t involve him I’m sure.

"Geo-engineering and its consequences are the price we may have to pay for failure to act on climate change."

There is so much evidence (as in real world, not computer models) that completely rejects this so called man-made global warming cooling. Another thing, why do these state funded talking heads refer to climate change like it is something new? The climate has always changed and always will. But then I remember it isn’t about the scientific truth of anything, it is just about stirring up irrational responses, creating fear and advocating global governance and central control as the solution.

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” – Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in “A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind”, by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5

And if you wonder what he meant by ‘new world order’;

“We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” — Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

Also remember that they tried this shit in the 70’s and nature decided to prove them wrong.

This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000. — Lowell Ponte “The Cooling”, 1976

If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder by the year 2000…This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age. — Kenneth E.F. Watt on air pollution and global cooling, Earth Day (1970)

Funny, I don’t have to ice stake to work. But I don’t have to swim there either.